BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Asterisk specialist sought
- Subject: [Discuss] Asterisk specialist sought
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:25:54 -0600
- In-reply-to: <C508D131-CA35-46D9-A75C-E8453E4B624D@gmail.com>
- References: <548CCC0C.5060502@horne.net> <C508D131-CA35-46D9-A75C-E8453E4B624D@gmail.com>
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 06:36:09PM -0500, Gordon Marx wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2014, at 6:30 PM, Bill Horne <bill at horne.net> wrote: > > A friend and former employer asked me to pass along his need for > > an Asterisk specialist: I'm doing other things at the moment, but > > if you are an experienced Asterisk man, please email him directly. > > What if I'm an experienced Asterisk person who is offended by the > presumption that the only people who have such experience are men? > Was that his phrasing, so that I know not to work with him, or > yours, so I know to view everything you post through that lens? I happen to agree with your implicit agenda (gender equality and/or anti-sexism), but not your reaction. The usage above is traditional, and language patterns are habitual and unconscious, and mostly hard to unlearn, especially with age. At the time many of us on this list went to school (myself included), and quite possibly for a long time after that via usage in our social circles, we were taught to be THE way to say it. Good luck getting that out of some of our heads. I know I still do it even though I usually try not to. Perhaps we should accuse you of being agist for being intolerant of the usage? ;-) For what it's worth, there are plenty of well-reasoned opinions, many of which are written by women, indicting the gender neutralization language reform movement, not the least of which is the notion that it is sexist to think that women are so fragile that they require special protection from traditional language. Thus it's not even especially clear that discouraging (let alone publicly castigating) someone for failing to use gender-neutral language is the Right Thing?. It's just what's currently popular with the Political Correctness Police. Regardless, I think comments like this are polarizing and really have no place here, given that there was not obviously offensive intent. I might agree with your point if this was regarding a formal job posting, but this was nothing of the sort--it was just 3 lines of text from one of our members. It amuses me somewhat to think that if we were speaking German, or one of the romance or slavic languages, and I think Hebrew also (and probably lots of other languages), we would probably not even be having this conversation, as it is virtually impossible to construct a truly gender-neutral sentence in many of those languages. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Asterisk specialist sought
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] Asterisk specialist sought
- References:
- [Discuss] Asterisk specialist sought
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- [Discuss] Asterisk specialist sought
- From: gcmarx at gmail.com (Gordon Marx)
- [Discuss] Asterisk specialist sought
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Please point me to the thread about open-source software project management tools
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Asterisk specialist sought
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Asterisk specialist sought
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Asterisk specialist sought
- Index(es):