BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] No-SQL Database Recommendation?
- Subject: [Discuss] No-SQL Database Recommendation?
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 16:31:01 -0500
- In-reply-to: <54B188FE.4040409@borg.org>
- References: <54B188FE.4040409@borg.org>
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Kent Borg <kentborg at borg.org> wrote: > Don't care about big > transactional systems that .. > - Durable mostly. If the machine were unplugged without warning I > would expect to lose a little current data, but never corrupt the > whole database. Modern-filesystems and drive-controllers interact with DB ACID properties or lack there-of. Better have a Journalling file-system. With a single key, with locality of reference AND of update, some sort of b-tree file-of-records structure might be adequate. I've no clue which one is optimized for USUALLY appending high values. (Your non-random write order makes me think the standard B-tree would rebalance far too often when most inserts are actually appends .) -- Bill Ricker bill.n1vux at gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux
- References:
- [Discuss] No-SQL Database Recommendation?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] No-SQL Database Recommendation?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] No-SQL Database Recommendation?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] No-SQL Database Recommendation?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] No-SQL Database Recommendation?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] No-SQL Database Recommendation?
- Index(es):