BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] os x = poop?
- Subject: [Discuss] os x = poop?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:35:17 -0500
- In-reply-to: <615135ED-9979-45DE-9FD3-298E9F687BF5@icloud.com>
- References: <615135ED-9979-45DE-9FD3-298E9F687BF5@icloud.com>
On 2/11/2015 8:22 PM, Eric Chadbourne wrote: > I?ve been using a mac mini for the last few months and I must say the > hardware is nice but the software is pretty bad. There was a time when I called OS X the best Unix desktop out there. I meant it. It was NeXT with Apple's signature polish and by version 10.4 it was good. Really good. I liked it. I recommended it. That stopped with version 10.7 (Lion). Now I tolerate Macintosh because I have a Mac on my desk at work. That tolerance has been wearing. Mac OS X 10.7 marked the start of what I call the iOSification of OS X and the shift away from Macintosh as the digital hub. iPhone and iPad became Apple's focus, the shiny boxes that contain Apple's App Store, and that lead to OS X and Apple's bundled desktop apps looking and acting more and more like their mobile counterparts. And then the yearly major version releases in order to maintain visual parity. That's been a disaster for Apple. Every major release of OS X from 10.7 on has been horribly bug-ridden at launch and Apple lacks the manpower to fix and test in release anything that isn't security vulnerabilities. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] os x = poop?
- From: eric.chadbourne at icloud.com (Eric Chadbourne)
- [Discuss] os x = poop?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] os x = poop?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] os x = poop?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] os x = poop?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] os x = poop?
- Index(es):