BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Are there any no-cost vm's still out there?
- Subject: [Discuss] Are there any no-cost vm's still out there?
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:53:10 -0500
- In-reply-to: <54DCE4CE.7080709@horne.net>
- References: <54DCE4CE.7080709@horne.net>
On 2/12/2015 1:40 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote: >> From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org] On >> Behalf Of Eric Chadbourne >> >> How do you like vmware? I?ve been using virtualbox for years but I heard >> recently there?s only one dev really maintaining it. Too big a project for that. >> I wonder if it will be discontinued soon? > Virtualbox is really good for a free product. But if you use it all day every day, as a professional, then there's no question about it, vmware fusion and parallels are better. More features, better reliability, better performance. Fusion and Parallels are each better in their own ways - ultimately it's a wash between the two. They're both fine. Being a techy person, I prefer the vmware style over the parallels style. I'm curious: please give your reasons for and against each vendor, and tell us what your experience was installing and debugging each. TIA. Bill -- E. William Horne 339-364-8487
- References:
- [Discuss] Are there any no-cost vm's still out there?
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- [Discuss] Are there any no-cost vm's still out there?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] os x = poop?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] os x = poop?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Are there any no-cost vm's still out there?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Are there any no-cost vm's still out there?
- Index(es):