BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] transmitting legal documents
- Subject: [Discuss] transmitting legal documents
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 12:51:13 -0500
- In-reply-to: <54E87A3D.4060401@blu.org>
- References: <BN3PR0401MB12046B091F0FA6E67DDB34A2DC2F0@BN3PR0401MB1204.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <54E366FE.3060806@borg.org> <BN3PR0401MB1204BCFBB4B81B46A3F6A020DC2F0@BN3PR0401MB1204.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <54E37F9E.9040001@borg.org> <54E388A3.9080608@mattgillen.net> <54E391AE.2000304@borg.org> <54E39B78.1050909@borg.org> <BN3PR0401MB120461F5A6D32B345AC39231DC2F0@BN3PR0401MB1204.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <54E3AE84.2010401@mattgillen.net> <54E87A3D.4060401@blu.org>
Jerry Feldman wrote: > Unfortunately fax machines are a legal way to send information. While > today many transactions are done by email, fax is the only legally > recognized way to send a document. It's true that there are industries that are holdouts for using fax (like doctors), and few companies are wise enough to adopt open encryption standards, like S/MIME (instead fording you to use web sites or other proprietary encryption for sending secure messages), but there is no legal necessity to use fax. When you say "legally recognized way" it really comes down to what is recognized by the law and the courts as a legitimate way to sign a legal document, and that was addressed by the ESIGN Act in 2000. See: https://www.docusign.com/electronic-signature-legality "...the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN, 2000) and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA, 1999)...establish that electronic records and signatures carry the same weight and legal effect as traditional paper documents and handwritten signatures..." http://www.pcworld.com/article/253523/how_to_make_sure_that_digital_signature_is_legit.html http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/electronic-signatures-online-contracts-29495.html http://www.isaacbowman.com/the-history-of-electronic-signature-laws http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Signatures_in_Global_and_National_Commerce_Act We've executed consulting contracts using e-signatures. Read the PC World article above to see examples of the actual format that an e-signature takes. It has basically no security against being forged. The approach seems laughable but I guess PKI was beyond the grasp of legislators. When not using a third party service like DocuSign, we have clients digitally sign documents with PKI in addition to adhering to the ESIGN signature format. -Tom -- Tom Metro The Perl Shop, Newton, MA, USA "Predictable On-demand Perl Consulting." http://www.theperlshop.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] transmitting legal documents
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] transmitting legal documents
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] transmitting legal documents
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- [Discuss] transmitting legal documents
- References:
- [Discuss] Most common (or Most important) privacy leaks
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] Most common (or Most important) privacy leaks
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Most common (or Most important) privacy leaks
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] Most common (or Most important) privacy leaks
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Most common (or Most important) privacy leaks
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- [Discuss] Most common (or Most important) privacy leaks
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Most common (or Most important) privacy leaks
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Most common (or Most important) privacy leaks
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] Most common (or Most important) privacy leaks
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- [Discuss] Most common (or Most important) privacy leaks
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] Most common (or Most important) privacy leaks
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Raspberry PI 2
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Raspberry PI 2 vs. ODROID-C1
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Most common (or Most important) privacy leaks
- Next by thread: [Discuss] transmitting legal documents
- Index(es):