BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Raspberry PI 2
- Subject: [Discuss] Raspberry PI 2
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 13:10:12 -0500
- In-reply-to: <54EA15CC.4090601@borg.org>
- References: <da3e7d12fc314adf1c979d5033982d53.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <54EA1309.1040602@horne.net> <54EA15CC.4090601@borg.org>
Kent Borg wrote: > ...this little beast is nearly wide open. (Okay, the Broadcom chip > is not publicly documented and binary blobs are needed to use much of > it, but still...) The proprietary nature of the Pi is still its most significant drawback. A practical example of that limitation is the lack of an Android build for the Pi. OpenBSD is also not available[1]. (Though other BSDs are[2].) There are other Pi clones[3] that are more open. And other boards[4] with similar functionality, but Pi is more popular and has a larger support community than just about anything. -Tom 1. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=132788027403910&w=2 2. http://www.raspberrypi.org/netbsd-is-here/ 3. http://www.bananapi.org/ 4. http://beagleboard.org/ -- Tom Metro The Perl Shop, Newton, MA, USA "Predictable On-demand Perl Consulting." http://www.theperlshop.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Raspberry PI 2
- From: jack at coats.org (Jack Coats)
- [Discuss] Raspberry PI 2
- References:
- [Discuss] Raspberry PI 2
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Raspberry PI 2
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- [Discuss] Raspberry PI 2
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Raspberry PI 2
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Raspberry PI 2 vs. ODROID-C1
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Raspberry PI 2
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Raspberry PI 2
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Raspberry PI 2
- Index(es):