BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] perl/Tk
- Subject: [Discuss] perl/Tk
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:29:09 -0500
- In-reply-to: <BN3PR0401MB1204046737D3F170718EE3ABDC150@BN3PR0401MB1204.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
- References: <20150227192654.GA27874@aldeberon> <BN3PR0401MB1204046737D3F170718EE3ABDC150@BN3PR0401MB1204.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On 2/27/2015 5:33 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote: > First of all, see if you can abandon cpan, and use packages that are > built in to your yum repository. Much more reliable (and faster.) Yep. If you cannot avoid perl then avoid CPAN at all costs. It will screw you over. Packages in CPAN will break, and everything that you depend on in CPAN will go away with your next major OS upgrade. EPEL is a good place to start for packages that aren't in RHEL or its derivatives. The only times that I've had problems with EPEL is conflicts with Scientific Linux and solving those is as simple as an exclude line in my epel.repo files. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] perl/Tk
- From: jdm at moylan.us (dan moylan)
- [Discuss] perl/Tk
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] perl/Tk
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] perl/Tk
- Next by Date: [Discuss] perl/Tk
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] perl/Tk
- Next by thread: [Discuss] perl/Tk
- Index(es):