BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- Subject: [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- From: jomalloy at gmail.com (John Malloy)
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:07:01 -0800
- In-reply-to: <54F9D7F2.7010206@gmail.com>
- References: <CANaytcdQpyMcy-JMHKmOGAkh169dk3JtYRpc9UuWAGD+p0odvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOTD2YQ=eXmgtcXaSioGL_bJVgCjE9Kt0y-pP9_hCS-ZumV2XQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANaytceaFN9pjQYiqQo=hZMrvRoXugEbye2NGuB0L_-LJHCfhQ@mail.gmail.com> <54F9D7F2.7010206@gmail.com>
Has anyone used the Turnkeylinux installs? I tried the gitlab on a Debian distro and it was pretty straightforward Thanks! John Malloy jomalloy at gmail.com On Mar 6, 2015 8:38 AM, "Richard Pieri" <richard.pieri at gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/6/2015 8:49 AM, Greg Rundlett (freephile) wrote: > >> compounded by the tendency for users of said vendor apparaturs to believe >> that application deployment or System Administration is something that can >> be done in two clicks and 15 minutes. >> > > When in fact it takes less than 5 minutes and a light timer: > https://xkcd.com/1495/ > > :) > > -- > Rich P. > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
- References:
- [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- From: matt at mattshields.org (Matt Shields)
- [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Boston Linux and Unix InstallFest LV Saturday March 14, 2015
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Boston Linux and Unix InstallFest LV Saturday March 14, 2015
- Index(es):
