BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] cell Network time no longer provided
- Subject: [Discuss] cell Network time no longer provided
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:51:15 -0400
- In-reply-to: <5506EA87.9010505@borg.org>
- References: <5506D38F.9060206@blu.org> <CAMdng5uWe74+p7+FwwzXJM7KrLBEoA7GRZQME7-tUBQ-E4LhUQ@mail.gmail.com> <5506EA87.9010505@borg.org>
So far, US carriers are still using legacy protocols (GSM and CDMA) for voice calls and text messages. Higher speed protocols (HSDPA, HSPA+) are used for the data side by GSM carriers; CDMA carriers use EVDO. Both use LTE for their latest data offerings. They are starting to implement VoLTE (voice over LTE) as a replacement for legacy protocols but it will be years until the switch is complete. I don't know whether LTE includes any notion of time services; if not, the current notion of carrier-provided time will go out the window when LTE-only devices start to appear. But any LTE-capable device could easily synchronize to an NTP server on the internet if the OS includes that capability. So far as I know neither iOS nor Android currently does, though you can get third party apps to add automatic NTP synchronization to a rooted Android device. On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Kent Borg <kentborg at borg.org> wrote: > On 03/16/2015 09:46 AM, Shirley M?rquez D?lcey wrote: >> >> CDMA networks (Verizon, Sprint, and their MVNOs) are unlikely to make >> that change because they MUST have accurate time sources available at >> every cell site. > > > They have to have precise timing to make CDMA soft-hand-off work, but does > that necessarily translate into providing the civilian time information that > the phone OS is looking for? > > "Time", in a physics sense, is pretty simple. Some cool relatively stuff, > and questions about why it is unidirectional, not withstanding. > > But "time", in a civilian sense is complicated as hell: We want it to line > up with contradictory celestial stuff and the changing whims of law makers > on various levels of government and in various geographies. > > Providing precise phase information to CDMA isn't the same as knowing when > daylight saving time begins. Might they have just dumped the civilian part? > Remember, GPS time is now many seconds off of the seconds-portion of > civilian time. > > Also, aren't the old GSM carriers now using updated protocols that are > getting all spread spectrum on us? Do they need some of that precise timing > coordination now, too? > > -kb > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] cell Network time no longer provided
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] cell Network time no longer provided
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] cell Network time no longer provided
- References:
- [Discuss] cell Network time no longer provided
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] cell Network time no longer provided
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- [Discuss] cell Network time no longer provided
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] cell Network time no longer provided
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] cell Network time no longer provided
- Next by Date: [Discuss] cell Network time no longer provided
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] cell Network time no longer provided
- Next by thread: [Discuss] cell Network time no longer provided
- Index(es):