BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] OSX Mavericks root exploit, and Safari
- Subject: [Discuss] OSX Mavericks root exploit, and Safari
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 17:55:28 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20150417213735.9B14C2282F4@palinka.tinho.net>
- References: <CAAbKA3UJjVjfjbOe0gJcCz==2yuNvAQQwXdJFPUQ126gWpkF7Q@mail.gmail.com> <20150417213735.9B14C2282F4@palinka.tinho.net>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 5:37 PM, <dan at geer.org> wrote: > <polemic> > > Suppliers who walk away from their code bases must eventually become > subject to the rule of law. > > On Abandonment, IEEE > Agreed. Revising our laws to either provide strict product liability *or* reversion of abandonned IP to the public would seem pragmatic. Somehow i doubt those terms are built into the closed-text Trans Pacific Partnership treaty that we're being asked to accept sight-unseen. ? Alas they'd probably dodge liability by saying it was past its useful life ... however useful it is to us. -- Bill Ricker bill.n1vux at gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] OSX Mavericks root exploit, and Safari
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- [Discuss] OSX Mavericks root exploit, and Safari
- References:
- [Discuss] OSX Mavericks root exploit, and Safari
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] OSX Mavericks root exploit, and Safari
- From: dan at geer.org (dan at geer.org)
- [Discuss] OSX Mavericks root exploit, and Safari
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] OSX Mavericks root exploit, and Safari
- Next by Date: [Discuss] OSX Mavericks root exploit, and Safari
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] OSX Mavericks root exploit, and Safari
- Next by thread: [Discuss] OSX Mavericks root exploit, and Safari
- Index(es):