BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Secure Email
- Subject: [Discuss] Secure Email
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 06:56:55 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CANaytccP5jZNY4sv7Yt0xDAjTtRJYOg4F44091gsnzNo5NKYyw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CANaytccP5jZNY4sv7Yt0xDAjTtRJYOg4F44091gsnzNo5NKYyw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:34:36AM -0400, Greg Rundlett (freephile) wrote: > I'm considering email service* for my domain and wonder if anyone has > experience with Hushmail, S-Mail or Kolab Now? > > - http://www.s-mail.com/inf/1/users.shtml.en > - https://www.hushmail.com/hushmail-business/ > - https://kolabnow.com/moving > You'll have to define what you want. In my experience, the problems with things called "secure email" are: - People at the other end can't/don't use it, thus rendering it pointless. - You are unlikely to be able to use it with normal email tools - Traffic analysis still works against it - Sometimes it's not really email. It's a proprietary message database with an http/s frontend, that sends little email notices saying that you have a message, please log in. That's both a SPOF and a trust requirement. If you ignore usability and traffic analysis, PGP/GPG encrypted bodies are probably best. If you can't ignore usability, I don't know that there's anything useful. -dsr-
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Secure Email
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- [Discuss] Secure Email
- References:
- [Discuss] Secure Email
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- [Discuss] Secure Email
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Secure Email
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Secure Email
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Secure Email
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Secure Email
- Index(es):