BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] NAS: encryption
- Subject: [Discuss] NAS: encryption
- From: dbarrett at blazemonger.com (Daniel Barrett)
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 21:32:37 -0400
- References: <559D70F3.5090700@gmail.com>
On July 8, 2015, Richard Pieri wrote: >All of us... well, most of us anyway, myself included, were blinded >by the illusion [that open source affords more assurance than closed >source]. We believed if there were problems then "some smart people" >would have noticed them and fixed them because that's what open >source is all about. That didn't happen and we got another critical >security flag day for the year. Oh, please. Nobody actually believes that open source scrutiny will find *every* security problem. The empirical evidence is that apt-get regularly brings me security fixes, so people clearly are looking and fixing security bugs. Some of them will get missed for a long time, perhaps forever, but that's life because bug detection is provably undecidable. Dan
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] NAS: encryption
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] NAS: encryption
- References:
- [Discuss] NAS: encryption
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] NAS: encryption
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] NAS: encryption
- Next by Date: [Discuss] NAS: encryption
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] NAS: encryption
- Next by thread: [Discuss] NAS: encryption
- Index(es):