BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Subject: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:55:05 +0000
- In-reply-to: <06CF7A12-1C25-4648-8394-1DCA9C3AD35F@pioneer.ci.net>
- References: <mailman.16397.1436555755.2348.discuss@blu.org> <06CF7A12-1C25-4648-8394-1DCA9C3AD35F@pioneer.ci.net>
> From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org] On > Behalf Of Rich Braun > > As drive capacities increased, transfer speed also did. (You have updated > your motherboards to 6G SATA, right?) Nope. Well - Drives increased speed up to around 1Gbit/sec around 10 years ago, and there they stayed, and there they still are. They're limited by the frequency response of the heads. It took a surprisingly long time for SSD's to get faster than sustainable 1Gbit/sec, but they've accomplished it now. Nowadays, I expect a typical SSD to actually be limited by the 6Gbit bus.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- References:
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] VPS suggestions
- Next by Date: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Next by thread: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Index(es):
