BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] live streaming needs flash?
- Subject: [Discuss] live streaming needs flash?
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 21:41:43 -0400
- In-reply-to: <5ADF54C8-A2AE-4084-9B6A-89A49D6064BB@icloud.com>
- References: <79FF9B86-9468-45DE-93E1-CAE0A4BB9BC4@icloud.com> <CAMdng5tuswFFryPpkUUCLYw-=_JwECXa5erVnpxmuvYCUjiXkA@mail.gmail.com> <5ADF54C8-A2AE-4084-9B6A-89A49D6064BB@icloud.com>
Receiving video is pretty much the same whether or not the source is live. HTML5 can handle it. I thought the original question was about ORIGINATING a live stream. That is what is difficult to do in HTML5. And since originating a stream requires a plugin, some sites may also still be set up to require a plugin for playback; UStream is a good example, though their beta browser viewer may support HTML5 streaming. YouTube live events do not require a plugin to watch; they use HTML5 streaming if available. And there is an option to use a Google Hangout as the stream source, and I believe that also does not require a plugin if you stream from Chrome. Otherwise you need Flash to source a live stream. On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Eric Chadbourne <eric.chadbourne at icloud.com> wrote: > Fascinating. I'll read up on the camera API in HTML5. > > Thanks, > > Eric Chadbourne > Nonprofit-CRM.org > >> On Jul 27, 2015, at 7:23 PM, Shirley M?rquez D?lcey <mark at buttery.org> wrote: >> >> Although there has been a camera API in HTML5 since at least 2012, >> browser support has lagged; even now, developers can't count on it >> being available, and what support does exist is inconsistent. Flash is >> the most widely installed plugin so that is what developers used. It >> can also be done with Java or Silverlight but fewer users have those. >> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Eric Chadbourne >> <eric.chadbourne at icloud.com> wrote: >>> I've heard some smart folks say flash is needed for live streaming and nothing else is nearly as good. I've heard them say there is no good open source option. If this is true, why? Surely there's no magic sauce in there that couldn't be replicated, or even done better. Is it more of a matter of plugin saturation? Just curious. >>> >>> Eric Chadbourne >>> - The one who uses no flash or java plugins, ever. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> Discuss at blu.org >>> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss at blu.org >> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] live streaming needs flash?
- From: eric.chadbourne at icloud.com (Eric Chadbourne)
- [Discuss] live streaming needs flash?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] live streaming needs flash?
- References:
- [Discuss] live streaming needs flash?
- From: eric.chadbourne at icloud.com (Eric Chadbourne)
- [Discuss] live streaming needs flash?
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- [Discuss] live streaming needs flash?
- From: eric.chadbourne at icloud.com (Eric Chadbourne)
- [Discuss] live streaming needs flash?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] live streaming needs flash?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] live streaming needs flash?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] live streaming needs flash?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] live streaming needs flash?
- Index(es):