BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Replacing AD with Samba4
- Subject: [Discuss] Replacing AD with Samba4
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:30:52 +0000
- In-reply-to: <75bb6f1956f6333db1ce12bb84ca2fde.squirrel@webmail.ci.net>
- References: <75bb6f1956f6333db1ce12bb84ca2fde.squirrel@webmail.ci.net>
> From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org] On > Behalf Of Rich Braun > > Any suggestions? Is this known to work? Maybe I should just keep my > Windows > servers? But they're 6+ years old and probably fraught with security holes. I know it's not what you want to hear, but I'm sure Microsoft doesn't test their desktop OSes against Samba AD servers, so even if it works now, I wouldn't count on it for a production work environment. It will cost like $300/yr for windows server, which is nothing to a business. (That's if you pay $600 every other year for Server Standard, which permits you to run on two separate VM's simultaneously.) I just don't see anything to gain by trying to deviate from windows server. Unless you want to support a non-windows organization.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Replacing AD with Samba4
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Replacing AD with Samba4
- From: rpug at lp0.org (Ryan Pugatch)
- [Discuss] Replacing AD with Samba4
- References:
- [Discuss] Replacing AD with Samba4
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Replacing AD with Samba4
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Replacing AD with Samba4
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Replacing AD with Samba4
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Replacing AD with Samba4
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Replacing AD with Samba4
- Index(es):