BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- Subject: [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- From: m.m.rajwadkar at ieee.org (Mayuresh Rajwadkar)
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:23:42 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20150910173020.GA8891@dragontoe.org>
- References: <CALggPSnKM8sz3kAWQUwOMSgzpKMEQSxtzaeU6FfYN2H6H7vBpQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFv2jcbnt1FRNnX9=SXfY4mfaHauup2P2RzayxhKzHX6XUsetA@mail.gmail.com> <20150910173020.GA8891@dragontoe.org>
hi http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=b5d1f0f4&op=index That uploaded key as a MD5 and SHA224 of the ID aka email... One can verify that the email and fingerprint I provide will match up to those hashes.. Its not entirely impossible... I do appreciate Derek's concern... In my example I have used a UUID, which is the ultimate but one can use a FirstName/LastName which can be a little bit liberal, than providing an email address, embedding a thumb-print jpeg, or a IRIS-scan jpeg, or providing some kind of DNA fingerprint/sequence would be kind a overly liberal ? than just an email address, which is also possible... if privacy is no concern... Mayuresh On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Derek Martin <invalid at pizzashack.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:52:55PM -0400, John Abreau wrote: > > If a key has been stripped of all traces of the owner's identity, I don't > > see how it would be possible to adequately verify trust of that key > during > > the keysigning party. > > Or when you are sending them e-mail. Or at any other time. Positive > identification of the recipient is generally part of what is required, > so that you do not, say, encrypt company secrets to your competitor, > instead of your coworker, for example. > > -- > Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 > -=-=-=-=- > This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will > result in > undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience. > >
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- From: effigies at riseup.net (Chris Markiewicz)
- [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- References:
- [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- From: m.m.rajwadkar at ieee.org (Mayuresh Rajwadkar)
- [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- Next by Date: [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- Next by thread: [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- Index(es):