BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- Subject: [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- From: smallm at SDF.ORG (Mike Small)
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 15:24:05 +0000
- In-reply-to: <5638D010.8040509@gmail.com>
- References: <5638D010.8040509@gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 10:17:36AM -0500, Rich Pieri wrote: > Within the past few days, Debian have added another hard dependency on > systemd in sid. This time it is the Xorg server which is no longer setuid. > In order to make this work they implemented a hard dependency on > libpam-systemd along with a bunch of other onerous restrictions. At least > this time around they also created a legacy dpkg that retains the old > behavior. Funny, this was one of the few things that made systemd sound useful to me. I'm not going to switch to a distro that uses systemd and pam just to get it, but if I were using Debian already I'd be happy enough with the change. Other than running OpenBSD with its privilege separated X, isn't the systemd way the only way to run (part of?) the X server as a nonprivileged user? -- Mike Small smallm at sdf.org
- References:
- [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Debian adds another systemd dependency, Busybox drops it
- Index(es):