BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- Subject: [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 03:55:13 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20151112183838.GF23265@dragontoe.org>
- References: <mailman.38981.1447288128.2348.discuss@blu.org> <90E6B392-86C5-447A-80FD-F6858AB2F0C1@pioneer.ci.net> <20151112183838.GF23265@dragontoe.org>
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Derek Martin <invalid at pizzashack.org> wrote: > > I can't parse LPF, but I think BSD would have gotten there, > eventually... even without rms and the FSF. Or someone else would > have done it... Like Linus Torvalds. I'm not certain, but I think that 386BSD and Linux would have never happened without the GCC compiler suite. I don't recall any other freely distributable C compilers being available when they were first being developed. Even today the Linux kernel developers typically use GCC rather then the main free competitor (LLVM/Clang). FreeBSD, for example, used GCC by default until version 10 (released in 2014!). In addition, the community 386 port of Minix used GCC which is what Linus used for his initial Linux development environment. So as I see it the entire landscape of widely used free operating systems was dependent on GCC for which RMS was the major developer in the early days. RMS may have not been directly involved in a widely used OS kernel, but he was very involved in making sure the most important toolset required to develop one was available. Bill Bogstad
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- References:
- [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Dropping obsolete commands (Linux Pocket Guide) (dump/restore)
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Stallman stubborn
- Index(es):