BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] CU attempts to end robocalls [OT]
- Subject: [Discuss] CU attempts to end robocalls [OT]
- From: michael.tiernan at gmail.com (Michael Tiernan)
- Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 07:29:23 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20151208205006.0000744a@openmailbox.org>
- References: <mailman.7.1449594005.4532.discuss@blu.org> <20151208205006.0000744a@openmailbox.org>
On 12/8/15 8:50 PM, edwardp at openmailbox.org wrote: > The easiest way to combat this problem, would be to simply not answer > the call if you do not recognize the incoming phone number. Not really since that's caving to their desires. I'm not going to be held hostage by these a***** who want to waste my time by forcing me to screen my calls. When I was job hunting, I never knew what number would be calling me so I had to answer all of them. I'm also smart enough to realize that if the wife, daughter, friend, etc. had their cell phone stolen (and can't use it) and needed to reach me, they may resort to use "a different" phone. Spammers and the asswipes behind robocalls fall into the same group. I'd have no problems taking a hammer to their fingers on an anvil.
- References:
- [Discuss] CU attempts to end robocalls [OT]
- From: edwardp at openmailbox.org (edwardp at openmailbox.org)
- [Discuss] CU attempts to end robocalls [OT]
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Boston Linux Meeting Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - Introduction to Ceph and Architectural Overview
- Next by Date: [Discuss] CU attempts to end robocalls [OT]
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] CU attempts to end robocalls [OT]
- Next by thread: [Discuss] CU attempts to end robocalls [OT]
- Index(es):