BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] site monitoring suggestions?
- Subject: [Discuss] site monitoring suggestions?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:11:26 -0500
- In-reply-to: <5677FBDF.6000906@code-energy.com>
- References: <F2C52752-1372-4F32-92F7-66EFC7AFC15C@icloud.com> <5675C4B1.4060806@gmail.com> <5677FBDF.6000906@code-energy.com>
On 12/21/2015 8:17 AM, Cole Tuininga wrote: > I've heard a lot of my sysadmin friends are moving to Icinga > (https://www.icinga.org/) over Nagios. I have no experience with it, > myself. Icinga 2 is easier to deploy and ostensibly has more "features" than Nagios. On the other hand, Nagios has a much longer track record and favors a lean core architecture to Icinga's somewhat more monolithic core. NB: take the Nagios vs. Icinga comparison charts with a salt lick. The comparisons published by Netways, the company which owns the Icinga trademarks, are deliberately misleading and skewed to make Nagios look bad. I for one am not switching from Nagios any time soon. Icinga offers nothing that Nagios does not already do for me and I'm not partial to Netways' dishonest practices. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] site monitoring suggestions?
- From: eric.chadbourne at icloud.com (Eric Chadbourne)
- [Discuss] site monitoring suggestions?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] site monitoring suggestions?
- From: colet at code-energy.com (Cole Tuininga)
- [Discuss] site monitoring suggestions?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] site monitoring suggestions?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] site monitoring suggestions?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] site monitoring suggestions?
- Index(es):