BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- Subject: [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: smallm at SDF.ORG (Mike Small)
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:05:18 +0000
- In-reply-to: <568C9811.90400@gmail.com>
- References: <f1b9707b8c7d334e6a63e30d793b55ca.squirrel@webmail.ci.net> <568BF596.7020406@gmail.com> <CAMdng5ux-T7_=rRFTGSCmroexfb42dfdPy+5uC_-R7_yZO_KkA@mail.gmail.com> <568C14D7.4080506@gmail.com> <201601060251.u062pufj018428@dsl092-065-009.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net> <568C9811.90400@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 11:29:05PM -0500, Rich Pieri wrote: > On 1/5/2016 9:51 PM, Robert Krawitz wrote: > > I don't agree. Even if you can't easily resolve the individual > > pixels, the higher density improves the definition and may allow you > > to e. g. use a smaller font or smaller icons and be able to read them > > as easily. > > A 10 point typeface on a 15" display panel at 1080p will be a given > size. The same 10 point typeface on a 15" display panel at UHD will be > 1/4 the size, appearing as the equivalent of a 2.5 point typeface at > 1080p. All the "improved definition" marketing hype in the world won't > make legible a 2.5 point-looking face at reasonable viewing distances. Eh? I thought point meant point and that this only happened when you make the mistake of specifying your font size in pixels, e.g. pixelsize instead of size in fontconfig language. Though that seems a common mistake. e.g. I was looking at st (simple terminal from the suckless project) and its default font is specified in pixel size giving poor results for me even on an old monitor at 1680x1024. -- Mike Small smallm at sdf.org
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- References:
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- Next by Date: [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- Next by thread: [Discuss] 4K (or 5K) resolution for Linux desktop
- Index(es):