BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Delivering mail to folders
- Subject: [Discuss] Delivering mail to folders
- From: david at thekramers.net (David Kramer)
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:47:10 -0500
- In-reply-to: <56AEC219.10807@gmail.com>
- References: <56AE7E30.8000002@thekramers.net> <56AEC219.10807@gmail.com>
I made certain to go over the itemized costs from 0-6 months, 6-12 months, and 12 months and beyond. If the costs above and beyond that are significant you can be sure I will complain. I did get the prices for the set top boxes, etc. Part of the math I did was the cost of power and maintenance of running the server at home. It's not enough money that I couldn't change my mind on that, but I hadn't really heard of that path until after I started down this one. I agree having my mail at home would DEFINITELY be better from a legal/safety perspective. That would also mean I can rebuild my server better at a later time. Is this the kind of thing you're talking about https://sdoconnell.net/how-tos/hosting-email-at-home/ ? (Better links are greatly appreciated) As for my reasoning: - It is a bit complex because I own like 8 domain names I use for different purposes. - As I said I have complex procmail rules that move mail to the right folders, eliminate spam, and forward high priority mail to text messages on my phone. I don't think that's something I want to give up, though I may not use procmail to do it in the new solution. - Unlike the majority of people in BLU, I am a developer, not a sysadmin, but I need to keep up my sysadmin skills, as well as have a place to host stuff. Thanks. On 01/31/2016 09:25 PM, Tom Metro wrote: > David Kramer wrote: >> Quick update: Just yesterday I contracted with Verizon for residential >> class triple play. > I'll be curious to see what level of service you get from the > residential class service. > > I went through the quotation process for business class FIOS, and was > disappointed to see 30% or more price increase attributed to taxes and > fees and equipment charges, over and above their advertised prices. 10%, > sure, that's expected, but over 30%? It felt like I was doing business > with a classic telecom (which they are), and not an internet provider. > > >> Giving up static IP... >> I also got a server on Linode and set up Postfix/Dovecot. > Other threads have recently mentioned the idea of using a dynamic IP > service combined with a cloud server, presumably using a VPN connection > to the cloud server. (Though if all you want is a VPN end-point with a > static IP, I'm sure someone can sell you that for less than a cloud > server. I seem to recall that HE provides IPv6 end-points for free or > cheap. I actually might be in the market for a VPN end-point that can > host a IPv4 class C I own.) > > But you're planning to put not just your mail relay point, but your mail > storage in the cloud. The compelling reason for running your own mail > server is to physically have the storage be on premise, so it gains > certain legal protection that you don't get with a cloud service. If you > are going to store your mail in the cloud, then why not let someone else > maintain Postfix, Dovecot, and the spam filters? > > So I'm curious why you are bothering to run your own mail server? For > the fun or experience? Is your mail setup highly specialized? > > There are mail hosting services that support sorting/filtering rules. > (Dreamhost, for example, supports Sieve.) > > -Tom >
- References:
- [Discuss] Delivering mail to folders
- From: david at thekramers.net (David Kramer)
- [Discuss] Delivering mail to folders
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] Delivering mail to folders
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Delivering mail to folders
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Delivering mail to folders
- Index(es):