BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] systemd explanations
- Subject: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:46:22 -0600
- In-reply-to: <56C5F569.4050005@gmail.com>
- References: <56C53172.2010709@riseup.net> <56C553DC.9000004@gmail.com> <CAJ=RwfbRD1jeq=cCnznzi1SXnBaotfPXy-FD5LL-HD1dgwW19w@mail.gmail.com> <56C5F569.4050005@gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:46:33AM -0500, Rich Pieri wrote: > Which is not to say that I would be uncritical of systemd, just that my > criticisms would be more focused on the technical aspects. =8^) -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- References:
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Converting "rich" (MIME) email to plain text
- Next by Date: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Next by thread: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Index(es):