BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] systemd explanations
- Subject: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:00:16 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20160222112000.0bbdf820@mydesk.domain.cxm>
- References: <56C53172.2010709@riseup.net> <20160218012553.2e621d4f@mydesk.domain.cxm> <CAAbKA3UqROHErN=yQ6hopoBocXa4_94t2E3OMjDyXcgY5fbXYA@mail.gmail.com> <56CAF639.7060904@blu.org> <20160222112000.0bbdf820@mydesk.domain.cxm>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com> wrote: > refers to advantages of systemd > over "the old way", hold his feet to the fire, in terms of the many > excellent alternatives to systemd and sysvinit, and the costs of > systemd. So the big point is casting this as a binary decision is a false dichotomy. The choice is not between horse-carts and Stanley-steamers , we can consider internal combustion, all-electric, and hybrid as well. -- Bill Ricker bill.n1vux at gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- References:
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Next by Date: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Next by thread: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Index(es):