BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] ***SPAM*** Re: Does sendxmpp actually work?
- Subject: [Discuss] ***SPAM*** Re: Does sendxmpp actually work?
- From: dbarrett at blazemonger.com (Daniel Barrett)
- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 15:02:09 -0500
- References: <mailman.3.1447520404.13879.discuss@blu.org> <22233.56453.526583.943623@snorkack.blazemonger.com> <20160304191947.GN23158@randomstring.org>
On March 4, 2016, Dan Ritter wrote: >I just got [sendxmpp] working with -e and -n options to connect to a >test ejabberd. > >Try -e or -t ? Thanks Dan! With your tips, I got it working. I used the -t option, and also switched to a server that runs ejabberd (im.koderoot.net) instead of rows.io. Now I can send messages, albeit with (harmless?) Perl warnings: $ echo foo | sendxmpp -t me at someplace Odd number of elements in anonymous hash at /usr/share/perl5/IO/Socket/SSL.pm line 1374. Use of uninitialized value within @_ in anonymous hash ({}) at /usr/share/perl5/IO/Socket/SSL.pm line 1374. Thanks again for your quick & informative reply. -- Dan Barrett dbarrett at blazemonger.com
- References:
- [Discuss] Does sendxmpp actually work?
- From: dbarrett at blazemonger.com (Daniel Barrett)
- [Discuss] Does sendxmpp actually work?
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Does sendxmpp actually work?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Debian on RISC-V
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Boston Linux Meeting Wednesday, March 16, 2016 - Linux Soup XVI: SystemD
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Does sendxmpp actually work?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Boston Linux Meeting Wednesday, March 16, 2016 - Linux Soup XVI: SystemD
- Index(es):