BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Subject: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:04:23 -0400
- In-reply-to: <56F5A511.1060304@gmail.com>
- References: <CANaytcd4GaTv2790aYUxuh8N2czR4HcHeZasSKBvctaHzAxurA@mail.gmail.com> <56F5A511.1060304@gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Rich Pieri <richard.pieri at gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/25/2016 3:33 PM, Greg Rundlett (freephile) wrote: > > If the government actually goes through with 'open sourcing' their work, > > it's actually a giant corporate handout because companies will have > greater > > access to publicly funded works that they can then incorporate into > > proprietary works. > > Public works are, by definition, for the whole public. This includes > corporations as much as it does you and me. Denying equal access to > public works by restricting how the works can be used is unconstitutional. Wot? I am saying that a Free Software license would provide greater access to public works. I said nothing about denying access. Instead, I point out that when public works can be turned into proprietary works that THEN we the people would be denied free access.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- References:
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Index(es):