BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Subject: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 08:38:50 -0400
- In-reply-to: <87fuvd43hq.fsf@host378.hostmonster.com>
- References: <CANaytcd4GaTv2790aYUxuh8N2czR4HcHeZasSKBvctaHzAxurA@mail.gmail.com> <87fuvd43hq.fsf@host378.hostmonster.com>
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:18 PM, David Rysdam <david at rysdam.org> wrote: > "Greg Rundlett (freephile)" <greg at freephile.com> writes: > > If the government actually goes through with 'open sourcing' their work, > > it's actually a giant corporate handout because companies will have > greater > > access to publicly funded works that they can then incorporate into > > proprietary works. > > By that argument, roads are a "giant corporate handout" because shipping > and schools are a "giant corporate handout" because they teach useful > skills. > Software is completely different than roads or schools. But you already know that. So I don't know why you're making this argument. Greg Rundlett https://eQuality-Tech.com <https://equality-tech.com/> https://freephile.org
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- References:
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Index(es):