BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Subject: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:55:02 -0400
- In-reply-to: <57071856.2020103@riseup.net>
- References: <chxtwjdh297.fsf@iceland.freeshell.org> <5706DCE3.2090009@riseup.net> <5706FD5F.5050307@gmail.com> <57071856.2020103@riseup.net>
On 4/7/2016 10:32 PM, IngeGNUe wrote: > No, that's exactly what I mean by privatization. Okay. I'm cool with it. I find it interesting that you mean this and then go on to call the GPL the best software license for the public good. RMS created the first GPL and founded the FSF because, well, to put it bluntly, he threw a temper tantrum when Symbolics privatized the public domain LISP interpreter he gave them. RMS created the GPL with the specific intent of making it impossible to privatize public software. > There's a certain hesitation to make the property comparison, but I > think it's partially correct (the 'ware' part of soft-ware). Not from me. Software is not intrinsically different from property. It cannot be, because if it is then adding "software to" to an existing invention creates a new, patentable invention. I'm *not* cool with this. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- References:
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: smallm at sdf.org (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Index(es):