BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Strange sendmail (and postfix) spam issue: accepting fail "from" myself?
- Subject: [Discuss] Strange sendmail (and postfix) spam issue: accepting fail "from" myself?
- From: warlord at MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:25:59 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20160413230055.GE15025@dragontoe.org> (Derek Martin's message of "Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:00:55 -0500")
- References: <sjm4mbp5iqd.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <56FAB83E.6030704@gmail.com> <8130d3996b6a4646744f0d0d119dbc50.squirrel@mail2.ihtfp.org> <56FABEA2.3010705@gmail.com> <a46c09f3cbe281b228d7076471e89a51.squirrel@mail2.ihtfp.org> <20160413230055.GE15025@dragontoe.org>
Hi, Derek Martin <invalid at pizzashack.org> writes: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 02:09:15PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: >> So now I want to focus on Sendmail. Any sendmail guru's out there? > > Hello Derek! > > Did you ever find a solution for this for Sendmail? I would never > call myself a Sendmail guru, especially now--but I recall I spent some > time on trying to solve this a while back and failed. It seems the > Sendmail folks believe that fixing this is a bad idea, because it can > block legitimate mail e.g. if someone at your site sends mail to > someone at another site that has a .forward file that points to an > address at your site. In case that's not clear: > > From: foo at example.com > To: bar at example.org > > And bar at example.org has a .forward file that forwards to > baz at example.com. > > Apparently, this message will get lost. This seems like it should be > a fixable problem, but pffft. > > I did just find this recipe, which appears to be outdated: > > http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/examples/Ted.html > > I also thought SPF and/or DMARC would fix this, but I never got around > to trying to set any of that up... Alas, no, I never did figure this out. :( In my case, I know that the "forward back to myself" is never going to happen. This is just a mailman server, so all mail is either originating locally or being relayed through mailman. There should never be a remote connection where MAIL FROM is my domain. Of course it doesn't differentiate between a connection from 127.0.0.1 and a connection from elsewhere. :( So it's blocking mailman too when I put those blocks in. I think I might just switch to postfix when I have time. -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
- References:
- [Discuss] Strange sendmail (and postfix) spam issue: accepting fail "from" myself?
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] Strange sendmail (and postfix) spam issue: accepting fail "from" myself?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Strange sendmail (and postfix) spam issue: accepting fail "from" myself?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Do Cheap NAT Routers "Fill up"?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Strange sendmail (and postfix) spam issue: accepting fail "from" myself?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Do Cheap NAT Routers "Fill up"?
- Index(es):