BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] [OT] Google Found Disastrous Symantec and Norton Vulnerabilities That Are 'As Bad As It Gets'
- Subject: [Discuss] [OT] Google Found Disastrous Symantec and Norton Vulnerabilities That Are 'As Bad As It Gets'
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 16:14:29 -0400
- In-reply-to: <chxmvm3vll4.fsf@iceland.freeshell.org>
- References: <chxmvm3vll4.fsf@iceland.freeshell.org>
On 6/29/2016 3:31 PM, Mike Small wrote: > "Symantec runs their unpackers in the Kernel!" Yup. > To quote one of Hillary Clinton's emails: "WHAT??? Or, more to the > point, WTF??" Performance. Doing everything in the kernel means that their code does not need to keep waiting for the CPU to switch between ring 0 for reading and ring 3 for unpacking/parsing. Why is this "necessary"? Because all of the consumer-focused "technical" review sites heavily weight performance in their ratings. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] [OT] Google Found Disastrous Symantec and Norton Vulnerabilities That Are 'As Bad As It Gets'
- From: smallm at sdf.org (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] [OT] Google Found Disastrous Symantec and Norton Vulnerabilities That Are 'As Bad As It Gets'
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] [OT] Google Found Disastrous Symantec and Norton Vulnerabilities That Are 'As Bad As It Gets'
- Next by Date: [Discuss] [OT] Google Found Disastrous Symantec and Norton Vulnerabilities That Are 'As Bad As It Gets'
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] [OT] Google Found Disastrous Symantec and Norton Vulnerabilities That Are 'As Bad As It Gets'
- Next by thread: [Discuss] [OT] Google Found Disastrous Symantec and Norton Vulnerabilities That Are 'As Bad As It Gets'
- Index(es):