BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] deadmanish login?
- Subject: [Discuss] deadmanish login?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 10:19:14 -0500
- In-reply-to: <9fbe3bd3-4b45-9ca9-095d-21d8e2d26ecc@borg.org>
- References: <BD3AEAF8-C3A9-425E-A1DF-313491C25856@horne.net> <22678.5505.133056.545247@blazemonger.com> <gmSeg95lRrqD1BiAnonSofQI4-s-SX_4SDY7asObPKfjUSP7-qdxjTD9LgybioJRHcZkBKuOnpV5pYVDSYeFY3KSMRCNbv4x8ZmNfRaUV-Q=@protonmail.com> <9fbe3bd3-4b45-9ca9-095d-21d8e2d26ecc@borg.org>
On 2/4/2017 9:19 PM, Kent Borg wrote: > It doesn't matter how a password scores according to some elegant > information theory, what matters is how easy that password is for > someone to guess. And though password guessing has progressed mightily > in the last few years, it is still an expensive and subtle activity, > well beyond what some little piece of open source software is up to > instantly measuring. It's not expensive and it's not subtle when you can build an entry level password guessing rig for about $5K: http://www.netmux.com/blog/how-to-build-a-password-cracking-rig -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] deadmanish login?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] deadmanish login?
- References:
- [Discuss] deadmanish login?
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- [Discuss] deadmanish login?
- From: dbarrett at blazemonger.com (Daniel Barrett)
- [Discuss] deadmanish login?
- From: sillystring at protonmail.com (Eric Chadbourne)
- [Discuss] deadmanish login?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] deadmanish login?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] deadmanish login?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] deadmanish login?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] deadmanish login?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] deadmanish login?
- Index(es):