BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] KVM, virt-manager, and CentOS7
- Subject: [Discuss] KVM, virt-manager, and CentOS7
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:20:10 -0500
- In-reply-to: <sjm37fqdj00.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
- References: <5e0618873d4f8b27be3a64bca10bad15.squirrel@192.168.250.211> <CAEvgogH4TWOptcrmYrUyhyttH_K8Z9hyuSe=znTGnfeQx12N1w@mail.gmail.com> <sjm37fqdj00.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
I tried overt on a machine that was already hosting VMs. Needless to say, I had to painstakingly restore my KVM environment to get them back. The thing that I like about KVM and libvirt is that it works within a standard Linux system. I've tried vmware, parallels, and a number of other vm environments, and they just didn't have the features to get the job done. Networking between VMs didn't work or was a $$ feature. Snapshots and disk compaction not available. Sharing CPUs during idle. The next step up is vShpere and overt, which are so comprehensive that you are buried with features and have to, more or less, commit to using their strategy. Sure, if you want to run a large scale vm warehouse, something like overt is for you. If you want to host a small-ish number of VMs, or use VMs to develop/test software for different environments and operating systems, KVM with libvirt is much easier to set-up and use. > I've been playing with oVirt 4.0.6 on EL7.3 and I've almost migrated all > my VMs from my old VMware infrastructure. So far I'm enjoying it. I > can't say it was painless to set up -- ovirt has a lot of moving > parts -- but once I figured it all out it's been pretty smooth sailing. > > -derek > > Jerry Feldman <gaf.linux at gmail.com> writes: > >> A lot of this has been available in Fedora for several years. >> Unfortunately, the GUI support had been lacking where vmWare and >> VirtualBox >> provided a much easier way to do it. >> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:04 PM, <markw at mohawksoft.com> wrote: >> >>> Has anyone played with virt-manager and KVM on CentOS 7 lately? >>> >>> I was surprised by a lot of the things that were difficult or at least >>> arcane in previous releases are fairly trivial now. >>> >>> For instance, a few years ago, bridged networking was a fairly poorly >>> documented procedure of setting up a bridge, setting up the virtual >>> lan, >>> virtual adapters, etc. Now, its just a setting on the network adapter >>> when >>> you add it. >>> >>> I think I can easily step away from VMWare. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> Discuss at blu.org >>> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> > > -- > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH > warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] KVM, virt-manager, and CentOS7
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] KVM, virt-manager, and CentOS7
- From: warlord at MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] KVM, virt-manager, and CentOS7
- References:
- [Discuss] KVM, virt-manager, and CentOS7
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] KVM, virt-manager, and CentOS7
- From: gaf.linux at gmail.com (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] KVM, virt-manager, and CentOS7
- From: warlord at MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] KVM, virt-manager, and CentOS7
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] KVM, virt-manager, and CentOS7
- Next by Date: [Discuss] KVM, virt-manager, and CentOS7
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] KVM, virt-manager, and CentOS7
- Next by thread: [Discuss] KVM, virt-manager, and CentOS7
- Index(es):