BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Torrent of new spam
- Subject: [Discuss] Torrent of new spam
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:26:06 -0500
- In-reply-to: <87bb83c3d0df55819f5688debe5a379d.squirrel@webmail.ci.net>
- References: <87bb83c3d0df55819f5688debe5a379d.squirrel@webmail.ci.net>
On 2/14/2017 4:04 PM, Rich Braun wrote: > Suddenly, this morning my primary email address apparently found its way onto > that [spam] list. ... > > Apparently this new spammer has figured out a way to get past the RBLs and > SpamAssassin filters that I've had a lot of success with in the past. > > Is this a sudden new/widespread problem, or did I just get unlucky with the > combination of my email addresses and the (now fairly old) spam-control > software I've been using? We're all finding out just how tough it is to overcome the "Defender's Dilemma": when protecting a castle or a home or an inbox, there are always weaknesses we can't afford to cover. The spammers have now put sucker-bait ads on Craigslist and other "free" venues, advertising sought-after goods for low prices, and then they harvest the addresses of anyone who responds. There are also frequent leaks from commercial companies that sell their old customer lists, and "affiliated" marketing done by well-known web site owners. As the spam industry gains experience, money, and programming expertise, we can expect less and less help from "one size fits all" applications or services. I've stopped using my "primary" email address anywhere I don't have to^1 . I forward everything through my own server, and if any one address picks up spam, I just delete it. Having the server helps in other ways, too: I can send inquiries to ads on Craigslist without worrying about where the return address will be copied to, and it's trivial to block any IP address that's outside the range of countries I usually correspond with. Of course, that's a bit much for anyone still working full-time, but it's a viable solution for me. Until there's a FUSSP, we'll have to keep patching newly found back-doors that bypass the moats around our various castles. Bill Horne 1. bill at horne etc is OK here on discuss because the Mailman server auto-obfuscates addresses in the archives. So far, it's an effective measure, but of course I'll have to abandon the address if it gets on too many spam lists.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Torrent of new spam
- From: dbarrett at blazemonger.com (Daniel Barrett)
- [Discuss] Torrent of new spam
- References:
- [Discuss] Torrent of new spam
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Torrent of new spam
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Torrent of new spam
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Torrent of new spam
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Torrent of new spam
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Torrent of new spam
- Index(es):