BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Yesterday's Cloudflare News and Online Password Managers...
- Subject: [Discuss] Yesterday's Cloudflare News and Online Password Managers...
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:45:47 -0500
- In-reply-to: <18c2b817-5a12-d84c-c6f8-a4e3dba7858f@borg.org>
- References: <73316d0c-cea8-c571-2fcf-e2286da39f03@borg.org> <1838f9ab-494f-9b81-014a-dd036e3ee2cb@gmail.com> <18c2b817-5a12-d84c-c6f8-a4e3dba7858f@borg.org>
On 02/24/2017 11:38 AM, Kent Borg wrote: > -kb, the Kent who recently decided he needed to use a hash in > something he's programming at work, and there is no way he would have > chosen SHA-1 for that, even before yesterday's news. If nothing else, I have always been bugged by the fact that SHA-1 is a 160-bit result. That size always seemed wrong. -kb
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Yesterday's Cloudflare News and Online Password Managers...
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] Yesterday's Cloudflare News and Online Password Managers...
- References:
- [Discuss] Yesterday's Cloudflare News and Online Password Managers...
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Yesterday's Cloudflare News and Online Password Managers...
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Yesterday's Cloudflare News and Online Password Managers...
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Yesterday's Cloudflare News and Online Password Managers...
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Yesterday's Cloudflare News and Online Password Managers...
- Next by Date: [Discuss] On "Simple" Brute Forcing Passwords Not Being Simple
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Yesterday's Cloudflare News and Online Password Managers...
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Yesterday's Cloudflare News and Online Password Managers...
- Index(es):
