BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Eclipses Re: Great talks last night, however...
- Subject: [Discuss] Eclipses Re: Great talks last night, however...
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:25:54 -0400
- In-reply-to: <c3bd01c4-aed2-3747-73f4-67631616f9f0@gmail.com>
- References: <CAAbKA3XAO0L-1qV-rkCdQf5E=edfDLs4gZtGZgYz7Fj46sw7jA@mail.gmail.com> <c3bd01c4-aed2-3747-73f4-67631616f9f0@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Richard Pieri <richard.pieri at gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/20/2017 4:03 PM, Bill Ricker wrote: >> I wouldn't worry about solar power lost to the coming eclipses. Over the >> next 10 or 100 years, you'll lose far more to thunderstorms blotting out >> the sky; they cast bigger shadows more frequently. > > Yeah. And I'm even more concerned with the 10-14 hour (or more in some > parts of the world) solar outages we experience every day. Or night if > you prefer. For reals. Because despite Elon Musk's assertions, chemical > batteries are terrible ways to store electricity. They're inefficient > (~90% waste as heat). They're dirty (strip mining for rare metals, > hazardous chemicals needed to manufacture). They're non-renewable (while > some of the plastics and rare metals can be reclaimed, most of a > worn-out battery is landfill). Without an affordable, efficient, clean, > renewable and scalable way to store electricity, ground-based solar > can't be a solution. [sometimes stating the obvious below] So lets say that I accept everything you say about both the inefficiency and unclean characteristics of solar PV + battery storage. Are the current incumbent solutions (Oil, Coal, Natural Gas) any better on either characteristic? When doing your efficiency calculations, please don't cheat. i.e. Do total life cycle back to when the material was first buried underground. I suspect that even turning corn into ethanol is more energy efficient then the process that created fossil fuels. >From an economic perspective, it is beginning to look like residential solar + batteries might be preferable in the near future to current fossil fuel based grid power. Or at least that is the argument that many people are starting to make. Are they wrong? If they aren't wrong, is there some reason other than economics why switching from fossil fuels to solar + batteries would be a bad idea. I suspect you have some other energy solution in mind then the ones that have been mentioned so far on this thread. Care to share? Bill Bogstad
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Eclipses Re: Great talks last night, however...
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Eclipses Re: Great talks last night, however...
- From: smallm at sdf.org (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] Eclipses Re: Great talks last night, however...
- References:
- [Discuss] Eclipses Re: Great talks last night, however...
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] Eclipses Re: Great talks last night, however...
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Eclipses Re: Great talks last night, however...
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Great talks last night, however...
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Eclipses Re: Great talks last night, however...
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Eclipses Re: Great talks last night, however...
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Eclipses Re: Great talks last night, however...
- Index(es):