BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Subject: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 12:05:16 -0400
- In-reply-to: <21407534-2722-cddc-f12a-1a7e5638bb66@gmail.com>
- References: <sjmefrduz8f.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <62af97f0-2e03-7def-29d1-946887a1d169@gmail.com> <sjmr2vct1e3.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <21407534-2722-cddc-f12a-1a7e5638bb66@gmail.com>
Rich, On Tue, September 12, 2017 11:42 am, Richard Pieri wrote: > On 9/12/2017 10:52 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: >> I am sorry, but I completely disagree. Even with modern Wifi, I can get >> much better throughput using physical wires if for no other reason than >> each link can be switched and therefore isn't "shared". With Wifi, >> every device is sharing the medium. I.e., I can get 20-30Gbps aggregate >> across my 1Gbps physical network, versus maybe 1.2Gbps across my 1200AC >> Wifi. And let's not even start with interference from my neighbors! > > All true, but you're not making an argument about future-proofing. > You're boasting about how fast your network is. No, I'm pointing out that wires are better than Wifi by showing actual capabilities. If you had a wired network then you'd have that capability too. It's just a fact that wired networks are more capable than wireless. > Wires aren't forever. They fail. They're supplanted by new standards. > They're not even available on the most common devices today. Running > wires is not future-proofing. It's future-obsolescence. Wired ethernet over twisted pair has not significantly changed in 25 years. The capabilities of the technology has changed (10, 100, 1G) but the underlying physical wires haven't (generally). Sure, there's the update from Cat3 to Cat5 to Cat5e to Cat6, but Cat5e is still a 20-year-old tech. Had you installed Cat5e 20 years ago you'd still be in fine shape today. My new thinkpad, just acquired a couple months ago, still has an RJ45 jack. Sure, the two Macs in the house don't come with that, although we have the lightning adapter for my wife. All our "smart" TVs have RJ45. Desktop and Server hardware has RJ45. Will they still have RJ45 in another 10-20 years? I certainly don't see it going away from many of the devices, although it's possible that fewer laptops will come with ethernet. But with Cat6 throughout I can always add additional APs wherever I might need them. :) > Rich P. -derek -- Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 derek at ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com Computer and Internet Security Consultant
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- References:
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Index(es):