BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Subject: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:34:13 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAMdng5tq9EXzKAPUVj2h7niDX=De5gu=HfDqAn3EA6owL3ubzw@mail.gmail.com> ("Shirley Márquez Dúlcey"'s message of "Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:00:22 -0400")
- References: <sjmefrduz8f.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <62af97f0-2e03-7def-29d1-946887a1d169@gmail.com> <77130c5e-78a3-d61c-5f05-707a5c20531b@borg.org> <sjmmv60t19o.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <CAMdng5tq9EXzKAPUVj2h7niDX=De5gu=HfDqAn3EA6owL3ubzw@mail.gmail.com>
Shirley M?rquez D?lcey <mark at buttery.org> writes:
>> Indeed. I'm thinking not just IP, but also possibly HDBaseT. I'm going
>> to run separate Cat5e for my PoE security cameras (which only need 100mbps).
>
> If you're doing it yourself the wire cost matters. If somebody else is
> doing it, the wire cost is insignificant compared to the labor cost so
> you might as well go with Cat6a throughout.
You make a good point.
My main issue with using Cat6A for the security cameras is that adding
the endpoints is harder. While I *HAVE* crimped a male RJ45 onto the
end of a Cat6a, I find crimping it onto a Cat5e MUCH easier (and more
secure). I suspect even if I have someone else do the work (still TBD --
I'll know more today) it might still be cheaper to use 5e for the
cameras. Oh, and 5e "bends" easier than 6a, making it easier to run.
Besides, a Cat5e is perfectly capable of 1Gbps + PoE, which is all I
need for the security cameras (which only run at 100mbps, even for
1080p).
FWIW, last time I DID do it myself, but made the mistake of using RG59
siamese cable for my cameras. IP cameras have come down in price in the
past 6-7 years, to the point where I can get a 1080p IP camera for even
less than I paid for my NTSC cameras! Yikes.
I'd like to do it myself again, but I now have 2 small kids, so I'm not
sure how I'll be able to spend the 40-60 man-hours at the construction
site.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins 617-623-3745
derek at ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com
Computer and Internet Security Consultant
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- References:
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Index(es):
