BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Fidelity voice-recognition security?
- Subject: [Discuss] Fidelity voice-recognition security?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:17:30 -0500
- In-reply-to: <23060.21501.663030.241910@blazemonger.com>
- References: <23060.21501.663030.241910@blazemonger.com>
On 11/21/2017 11:27 AM, Daniel Barrett wrote: > I declined the feature. Fingerprinting a voice uniquely over a > low-quality telephone line? I can't imagine that's more secure than a > non-obvious password. What does the security crowd here think? Passwords suck. Voices are unique. In principle, voice identification can be a good authentication system. In practice, it depends on how many retries and how much deviation from a given user's baseline the system permits. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Fidelity voice-recognition security?
- From: joe at polcari.com (Joe Polcari)
- [Discuss] Fidelity voice-recognition security?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Fidelity voice-recognition security?
- References:
- [Discuss] Fidelity voice-recognition security?
- From: dbarrett at blazemonger.com (Daniel Barrett)
- [Discuss] Fidelity voice-recognition security?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] xsane pblm
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Fidelity voice-recognition security?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Fidelity voice-recognition security?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Fidelity voice-recognition security?
- Index(es):