BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- Subject: [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 18:49:38 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAKpWRCWLMbhYWjp+ot63f5qRXpeLh0-K-3bUO2aus+ThubFfxw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAPnB49EuvU7x9VkSjuuaV_Ea+QJjvmdMZPDW2rT=aC2qmKQ7Lw@mail.gmail.com> <20171205161516.GD30413@bladeshadow.org> <CAPnB49HVdoEmxGHMgS4nzmJ-OUT_Th=xoaCS+r9WcdGHTr0fkw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJFsZ=rMLy82rAJNzM_yzRtb=WFuFJHW6qh467ktWX_Z4F+a5w@mail.gmail.com> <CAPnB49GQiEqRoEZ7u9OY0Y0KmDUxaFG49x3zDzt6=WTrtOZhZg@mail.gmail.com> <chxzi6nvqqq.fsf@sdf.org> <20171212141359.4e1487a8@mydesk.domain.cxm> <CAKpWRCWLMbhYWjp+ot63f5qRXpeLh0-K-3bUO2aus+ThubFfxw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:43:13 -0500 Theodore Ruegsegger <gruntly at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > > [Rationale for separating document content from presentation, as > > embodied in Stylz] > > Isn't this the raison-d'etre for DocBook? Yes. > > Last I looked, that seemed to be working pretty well, though it was > difficult to find tutorials that didn't lose me in short order. Your "though" clause is the raison-d'enre for Stylz. It's not just you who gets lost in Docbook tutorials/documentation. And don't get me started on XSLT. Choosing Docbook, one needs to be familiar with the Docbook standard, and for practical purposes, with Emacs. Everybody and their dog mentions Docbook as the solution to write-once, read-everywhere, but finding people actually using it productively for that purpose is extremely difficult. > On the other hand, for the relatively simple documents I write from > day to day, asciidoc is insanely easy to manage, and converts into > TeX, HTML, PDF, or whatever with the flip of an option or two. Asciidoc, AsciiDoctor, Markdown, and several other mini-markup languages are excellent solutions when arbitrary compromises can be made on the output appearance and perhaps structure, which is often. They are perfect for whipping out a little magazine or short story or set of instructions. They're very readable in their native format, and almost trivial to write converters for. To some extent, you can extend them with simple Python converters. In the case of AsciiDoctor, it might be as full featured as Docbook or (unfinished) Stylz, but getting AsciiDoctor to work that way is very, very challenging. The mini-markup languages fail hard when writing whole books in which consistency is a must, and specific style to appearance conversions are needed. This is because you can't create your own arbitrary paragraph and character styles in the mini-markups: You must use a built in style that's meant for something else. Which means your emphasized text, quotation text and story text will all look like each other. > > How does Stylz differ from DocBook and its derivatives? The unfinished Stylz differs from DocBook in that it doesn't yet work, it will NEVER be as completely and utterly versatile as Docbook, and it will be an order of magnitude easier to learn and use. It will be built for speed for the touch-typist, will be equally useable on all text editors. It will probably be faster to author than Docbook. You didn't ask how it differs from mini-markups like Asciidoc or Markdown, but I'll answer that anyway: It will have unlimited paragraph and character styles to use, and hopefully unlimited containers too. When Asciidoc and Markdown can no longer fill your needs, Stylz is where you'll turn. ============= Mike Small mentioned http://obsd.si/papers/eurobsdcon2014-mandoc-paper.pdf , which is an improved man page authoring tool. From what I learned skimming the link, mandoc has been created exclusively to create man pages, to the extent that its styles have a 1 to 1 correspondance with the semantics of a man page. This is great for man pages, but it would probably be easier to complete Stylz or use Docbook/XSLT than to broaden the usage of the very specific mandoc. SteveT Steve Litt December 2017 featured book: Thriving in Tough Times http://www.troubleshooters.com/thrive
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- From: smallm at sdf.org (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- From: dbarrett at blazemonger.com (Daniel Barrett)
- [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- From: gruntly at gmail.com (Theodore Ruegsegger)
- [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- References:
- [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- From: nancythewriter7 at gmail.com (Nancy Allison)
- [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- From: nancythewriter7 at gmail.com (Nancy Allison)
- [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- From: nancythewriter7 at gmail.com (Nancy Allison)
- [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- From: smallm at sdf.org (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- From: gruntly at gmail.com (Theodore Ruegsegger)
- [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- Next by Date: [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- Next by thread: [Discuss] LibreOffice and .docx files
- Index(es):