BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- Subject: [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:36:23 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20180628201650.fsepnpmr5n3smapm@randomstring.org>
- References: <mailman.3.1529856003.3307.discuss@blu.org> <164c1434c391677d60cc4353434e5e47@pioneer.ci.net> <20180628190957.GB32351@bladeshadow.org> <20180628201650.fsepnpmr5n3smapm@randomstring.org>
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 04:16:50PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 02:09:57PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 04:07:23PM +0000, Rich Braun wrote: > > > Derek Martin <invalid at pizzashack.org> raised a couple more interesting points: > > > > The trick is usually access. Like I have no way to SSH into my > > server at the moment... Technically I can do it from my phone, but > > I've found trying to do anything non-trivial on the phone is extremely > > tedious and time consuming, so while it can be done, not in the amount > > of time that wouldn't be extremely awkward while you're dealing with a > > sales clerk or whatever... > > So that's why you run dovecot on your server for IMAP access on > port 993, and K9mail or whatever on your phone. I think I mentioned my setup is really complicated... That includes having mailboxes in multiple mail formats, which, last I checked dovecot could not deal with (it supports all the ones I use, just not simultaneously, unless that's changed). The reasons for this are partly related to Mutt (historically new mail processing worked differently for different mail store formats) and partly performance related (different operations are faster on mbox than maildir, and vice versa). So I chose mail stores based on my access pattern and desired notification behavior for the given folder... http://does-not-exist.org/mail-archives/mutt-users/msg18190.html http://mutt-users.mutt.narkive.com/OE3ugjuM/is-it-safe-to-use-mbox http://www.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/2003-September/017386.html Much of these issues have long since been resolved with some effort spent on new mail handling, better caching implementations and file systems that better handle large numbers of small files, and other such things. I could of course redesign my whole mail scheme (and at this point, probably should) but just forwarding "important" messages to gmail was a whole lot easier. Someday... -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- References:
- [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- Index(es):