BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] ugly problem
- Subject: [Discuss] ugly problem
- From: smallm at sdf.org (Mike Small)
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 17:03:13 +0000
- In-reply-to: <20180722163500.GA6129@arcturas.localdomain> (dan moylan's message of "Sun, 22 Jul 2018 12:35:00 -0400")
- References: <20180722163500.GA6129@arcturas.localdomain>
dan moylan <jdm at moylan.us> writes: > since yesterday i have been having irregular freezeups on my > computer. for instance, today i was reading the nytimes via > chrome, and suddenly the mouse ceased to function, nor would > the touchpad on my keyboard. the screen content remained > unchanged, the mouse pointer visible but stationary. > neither ctl-alt-del nor ctl-alt-f2 had any effect. i > attempted to ssh in from another computer and got "no route > to host", nor could i ping. a hard reset restores apparent > normalcy -- at least for a while. times vary. i have yet > to experience a freeze w/o the browser running (which of > course is seldom the case). > > the computer is an intel nuc-10 running fc27. > > any suggestions would be appreciated. What you describe sounds consistent with running low on memory and the system swapping a lot or downright thrashing. If you walk away and come back several minutes later do things come back to normal at all? You might also try running top in a terminal or some other memory monitoring software to verify the pig process hypothesis. If other ideas in this thread don't work for you, chrome may have an extension to disable javascript selectively on parts of sites (like noscript in firefox can). You'll need at least some of the nytimes' own urls enabled for javascript so that you see a login button and pressing it does something, but perhaps without javascript on some of the other domains that load along with their pages the memory use will be small enough to suit your machine. When people criticize firefox and chrome for bloat they sometimes don't give proper "credit" to the authors of the websites themselves. I run firefox on very modest hardware (a 2 GiB RAM Core Duo based laptop made in 2006). When I have to use the web I prefer dillo where possible, but sadly, unlike the Guardian, NYTimes is not a site you can read with dillo. Their web developers seem not as skilled as their reporters. I manage to at least keep up with Paul Krugman's column using Firefox, though. I can only explain the lack of problems I have by my use of Firefox extensions like noscript, privacy badger, and uBlock Origin. Well, perhaps using twm as my Window manager doesn't hurt either, but my guess is that noscript is helping me more than that. With javascript enabled there is no limit to what sites can throw at your machine (particularly if you aren't up to date with meltdown and spectre mitigations ;)). -- Mike Small smallm at sdf.org
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] ugly problem
- From: gaf.linux at gmail.com (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] ugly problem
- References:
- [Discuss] ugly problem
- From: jdm at moylan.us (dan moylan)
- [Discuss] ugly problem
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Can't play videos in Firefox
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Can't play videos in Firefox
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] ugly problem
- Next by thread: [Discuss] ugly problem
- Index(es):