BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] RMS
- Subject: [Discuss] RMS
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 23:02:56 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20190921000304.GD3811@bladeshadow.org>
- References: <mailman.13873.1568931017.14410.discuss@blu.org> <878sqj3hah.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <5d8433ac.1c69fb81.55dd8.0c4b@mx.google.com> <20190921000304.GD3811@bladeshadow.org>
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 19:03:04 -0500 Derek Martin <invalid at pizzashack.org> wrote: > I read the thread (or as much of it as was readily available on the > web), and, much as I hate to defend rms, I think this is a gross > mischaracterization of what he said. But it's one tons of media > outlets have also made, so at least you're in good company. Six thousand-odd subscribers on csail-related. Six thousand-odd students and alums, faculty and staff, and others with various connections to CSAIL like technical committes and standards organizations. Six thousand-odd of the brightest, best-educated people in the world. No consensus. Some say RMS dug his own grave. Some say it was a gross mischaracterization. Good company, indeed, I think, regardless of which side you find yourself on. -- Rich Pieri
- References:
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: worley at alum.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] RMS
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] RMS
- Next by Date: [Discuss] RMS
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] RMS
- Next by thread: [Discuss] RMS
- Index(es):