BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] RMS
- Subject: [Discuss] RMS
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:34:38 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20190923165648.GG3811@bladeshadow.org>
- References: <mailman.13873.1568931017.14410.discuss@blu.org> <878sqj3hah.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <5d8433ac.1c69fb81.55dd8.0c4b@mx.google.com> <20190921000304.GD3811@bladeshadow.org> <CAFv2jcaVu3NkX3GdS9NpCfnp=FQ57O=-tF77TmFuhDSaP9V16Q@mail.gmail.com> <5d860f8d.1c69fb81.947a8.5ede@mx.google.com> <20190923162326.GF3811@bladeshadow.org> <20190923165648.GG3811@bladeshadow.org>
Thomas Bushnell has written a thoughtful piece about RMS on Medium: https://medium.com/@thomas.bushnell/a-reflection-on-the-departure-of-rms-18e6a835fd84 People who have been following this thread might want to read it. On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:58 PM Derek Martin <invalid at pizzashack.org> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:23:26AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > > Whatever conduct you want to criticize, you should describe it with a > > specific term that avoids moral vagueness about the nature of the > > criticism. > > > > I can not see how, unless you suck at reading English, you can > > interpret this any way other than that he takes issue with the term > > "sexual assault" PRECISELY because it is NOT "clearly defined." > > So I lied, I do see a way: If you choose to read in the worst > possible unstated intentions of the person making the statements. > This is unfortunately a tactic that has become commonplace in recent > years. Then you get the interpretation that you have taken. > > > > Now substitute Epstein for Minsky in RMS' rhetoric and see what you > get. > > Actully what rms expressly called for--being explicit about that which you > are accusing someone--would work just fine if you substituted Epstein > for Minsky. > > -- > Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 > -=-=-=-=- > This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will > result in > undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience. > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: mbr at arlsoft.com (MBR)
- [Discuss] RMS
- References:
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: worley at alum.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] RMS
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] RMS
- Next by Date: [Discuss] RMS
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] RMS
- Next by thread: [Discuss] RMS
- Index(es):