BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] RMS
- Subject: [Discuss] RMS
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:33:00 -0500
- In-reply-to: <5d8908ac.1c69fb81.947a8.a635@mx.google.com>
- References: <mailman.13873.1568931017.14410.discuss@blu.org> <878sqj3hah.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <5d8433ac.1c69fb81.55dd8.0c4b@mx.google.com> <20190921000304.GD3811@bladeshadow.org> <CAFv2jcaVu3NkX3GdS9NpCfnp=FQ57O=-tF77TmFuhDSaP9V16Q@mail.gmail.com> <5d860f8d.1c69fb81.947a8.5ede@mx.google.com> <20190923162326.GF3811@bladeshadow.org> <20190923165648.GG3811@bladeshadow.org> <5d8908ac.1c69fb81.947a8.a635@mx.google.com>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 02:02:19PM -0400, Rich Pieri wrote: > On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:56:48 -0500 > Derek Martin <invalid at pizzashack.org> wrote: > > > So I lied, I do see a way: If you choose to read in the worst > > possible unstated intentions of the person making the statements. > > This is unfortunately a tactic that has become commonplace in recent > > years. Then you get the interpretation that you have taken. > > Or the way that you seem to be directly avoiding: confusion. I didn't avoid that. I actually said almost exactly that: > > I can not see how, unless you suck at reading English, you can > > interpret this any way other than Poor reading comprehension is certainly a form of confusion. > RMS wrote two things which appear contradictory: > > Epstein was a serial rapist. I think he did not write this. Or at least, I can confirm that when *I* wrote it, it was my careless take on what someone else said he said. I doubt very much rms would make such a bald, imprecise statement. He's a bit of a windbag. > Sexual assault presumes the application of force or violence. > > Huh? So if Minsky or Epstein did not apply force or violence then it > wasn't sexual asasult or rape? Epstein wasn't charged with sexual assault, AFAIK, so it wouldn't apply. He was charged with prostitution and sex trafficking. But critically, rms never said the crime wouldn't apply. You have said that repeatedly in this thread, but he said nothing of the sort in the CSAIL thread in question. He only said that there are multiple things that have the same name which are not the same, and the term applied is extremely prejudicial in a way that causes people to think much worse of someone who is accused of it. And because of that instead you should be more specific about the accusation. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] RMS
- References:
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: worley at alum.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] RMS
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] RMS
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] RMS
- Next by Date: [Discuss] RMS
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] RMS
- Next by thread: [Discuss] RMS
- Index(es):