BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Password managers

Subject: [Discuss] Password managers
From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 10:09:30 -0400
In-reply-to: <0cbc8403-48a5-14bd-524c-a4eded6b64fa@borg.org>
References: <9c4a5c7e-55aa-8ae1-da3b-4512cb2ae85c@gmail.com> <5eb1f81d.1c69fb81.80c8b.07ca@mx.google.com> <CANiupv686GBC5EZVsiEf831-b4i0E3NjZ3fnsDToM02z1zjUNg@mail.gmail.com> <5eb223cd.1c69fb81.6fa04.3ab5@mx.google.com> <0cbc8403-48a5-14bd-524c-a4eded6b64fa@borg.org>

On 5/6/20 9:57 AM, Kent Borg wrote:
> A password (if not reused between sites) does not have to be 
> particularly strong.

And for one that is reused...doesn't matter so much. All your uses are 
as weak as the weakest site to which you have given that password.

-kb

Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Password managers
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)

References:
- [Discuss] Password managers
  - From: j.natowitz at gmail.com (Jerry Natowitz)
- [Discuss] Password managers
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Password managers
  - From: sweetser at alum.mit.edu (Doug)
- [Discuss] Password managers
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Password managers
  - From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] Password managers
Next by Date: [Discuss] Password managers
Previous by thread: [Discuss] Password managers
Next by thread: [Discuss] Password managers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread