BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] The Register: IBM, Red Hat face copyright, antitrust lawsuit from SCO Group successor Xinuos
- Subject: [Discuss] The Register: IBM, Red Hat face copyright, antitrust lawsuit from SCO Group successor Xinuos
- From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:20:58 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CA+h9Qs5ZLC=qdOQuXh=4X=DaisdHbGwvGbTqVOxD+H0TA_rqLw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAEvgogFP-eeGV9BHZ44UgG-Tv7uZ-vz4pgNHkA3y8SONwpPxqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAbKA3UgxZh1SVJ5bGBye6miZ8mQePBzvusrY0ByLU0vDEPm2w@mail.gmail.com> <CAEvgogHN8DNydans-70f=5DsfRD1xb-r1T4xAEFcP5vVwz3c_g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+h9Qs5ZLC=qdOQuXh=4X=DaisdHbGwvGbTqVOxD+H0TA_rqLw@mail.gmail.com>
Now that I think about it, we also tried SCO Unix after trying Xenix; that may have been the one where I couldn't install sendmail. In any case, the DOS-based WAFFLE system was the system that we finally got working and that became the first BCS mail server. On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 4:15 PM John Abreau <jabr at blu.org> wrote: > That's not entirely accurate. I attempted to build the first BCS mail > server on a Xenix system, but never got it working, as Xenix was neither > BSD nor System V, and the system we had didn't include any developer tools, > so I was unable to compile and install sendmail. > > I eventually dropped Xenix and installed a DOS BBS called WAFFLE that > exchanged email via UUCP and used Internet style RFC822 email addresses. > The WAFFLE system was our first mail server. > > A year later, Mike DeGenio, the BCS Resource Center Manager, approved my > request to use the NeXT machine in the BCS Resource Center to replace the > WAFFLE system. Originally we had planned on running it as the mail server > without removing it from use in the Resource Center, but then the > leadership of the BCS NeXT SIG unilaterally decided to sabotage the project > by locking me out of the system. > > To be fair, I had tried an experiment that broke the window system, and I > was too exhausted after a very long day at the BCS office to diagnose the > problem, so I figured I'd go home and fix it the next day when I was > rested. I emailed the NeXT SIG's leaders before I headed home to let them > know, and when I arrived the next day, I found they had sent me an email > demanding that I leave it alone and let them fix it. I didn't want to step > on any toes, so I left it to them. A few days later I discovered that they > locked me out by changing the root password and adding a BIOS lockout to > prevent single-user booting, but they didn't fix the window system. > > Mike DeGenio lost his temper after hearing about that, then he pulled the > machine out of the Resource Center entirely and told me to just make it a > dedicated mail server. Bypassing the BIOS lockout took about an hour of > digging through USENET for FAQs about the NeXT machine. After that, since I > wasn't overly tired, it took just a few minutes to figure out what went > wrong and to restore the window system. > > In any case, the NeXT machine was the second BCS mail server, and a year > later, after the BCS office moved from Cambridge to Waltham, we replaced > the NeXT machine with a Slackware Linux mail server. > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 1:39 PM Jerry Feldman <gaf.linux at gmail.com> wrote: > >> The first BCS mail server was xenix then upgraded to Sco Unix. I had SCO >> Unix on my home computer years ago. I think the server was an unused IBM >> PS2. >> >> -- >> Jerry Feldman <gaf.linux at gmail.com> >> Boston Linux and Unix http://www.blu.org >> PGP key id: 6F6BB6E7 >> PGP Key fingerprint: 0EDC 2FF5 53A6 8EED 84D1 3050 5715 B88D 6F6 >> B B6E7 >> >> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021, 10:50 AM Bill Ricker <bill.n1vux at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Some of us are old enough to remember The Santa Cruz Operation was the >> > preferred provider of legally licensed System III Unix or Xenix. (Before >> > the Caldera folks did the reverse merge taking the good name.) >> > >> > We ran that on Onyx Z8000 for dev servers back when, and I had a client >> > with System III on a 386 with two 8xSerial cards. >> > >> > Alas this story of the zombie arising yet again to eat more brainz is on >> > too many sites to be April Fools but it should be! >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 1, 2021, 10:06 Jerry Feldman <gaf.linux at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> We remember the ongoing suit of SCO vs IBM which also was an attack on >> >> Linux. And we remember, The SCO Group which was originally the Linux >> >> distro >> >> Caldera. Many of us watched Groklaw religiously. I guess it is time >> for a >> >> new web site. >> >> >> >> >> >> The Register: IBM, Red Hat face copyright, antitrust lawsuit from SCO >> >> Group >> >> successor Xinuos. >> >> >> >> >> https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2021/03/31/ibm_redhat_xinuos/ >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jerry Feldman <gaf.linux at gmail.com> >> >> Boston Linux and Unix http://www.blu.org >> >> PGP key id: 6F6BB6E7 >> >> PGP Key fingerprint: 0EDC 2FF5 53A6 8EED 84D1 3050 5715 B88D 6F6 >> >> B B6E7 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Discuss mailing list >> >> Discuss at lists.blu.org >> >> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss at lists.blu.org >> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > > > -- > John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix > Email jabr at blu.org / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0x920063C6 > PGP-Key-Fingerprint A5AD 6BE1 FEFE 8E4F 5C23 C2D0 E885 E17C 9200 63C6 > > -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix Email jabr at blu.org / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0x920063C6 PGP-Key-Fingerprint A5AD 6BE1 FEFE 8E4F 5C23 C2D0 E885 E17C 9200 63C6
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] The Register: IBM, Red Hat face copyright, antitrust lawsuit from SCO Group successor Xinuos
- From: gaf.linux at gmail.com (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] The Register: IBM, Red Hat face copyright, antitrust lawsuit from SCO Group successor Xinuos
- References:
- [Discuss] The Register: IBM, Red Hat face copyright, antitrust lawsuit from SCO Group successor Xinuos
- From: gaf.linux at gmail.com (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] The Register: IBM, Red Hat face copyright, antitrust lawsuit from SCO Group successor Xinuos
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] The Register: IBM, Red Hat face copyright, antitrust lawsuit from SCO Group successor Xinuos
- From: gaf.linux at gmail.com (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] The Register: IBM, Red Hat face copyright, antitrust lawsuit from SCO Group successor Xinuos
- From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] The Register: IBM, Red Hat face copyright, antitrust lawsuit from SCO Group successor Xinuos
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] The Register: IBM, Red Hat face copyright, antitrust lawsuit from SCO Group successor Xinuos
- Next by Date: [Discuss] The Register: IBM, Red Hat face copyright, antitrust lawsuit from SCO Group successor Xinuos
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] The Register: IBM, Red Hat face copyright, antitrust lawsuit from SCO Group successor Xinuos
- Next by thread: [Discuss] The Register: IBM, Red Hat face copyright, antitrust lawsuit from SCO Group successor Xinuos
- Index(es):