BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Virt-Manager
- Subject: [Discuss] Virt-Manager
- From: epp at sillydog.org (Edward)
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:33:10 -0400
- In-reply-to: <0C871447-9574-4F97-9104-E739FD0562BC@sillydog.org>
- References: <99870ed0-deb6-e9df-dfac-de671104f7f2@sillydog.org> <20211019002040.5quarkwtehz3encq@randomstring.org> <0C871447-9574-4F97-9104-E739FD0562BC@sillydog.org>
On 10/18/21 9:20 PM, Edward wrote: > I missed a setting, found it afterwards, it defaults to Virtual Network (NAT) and the box to start it automatically was initially not checked. > > It's working now. > And it (take your pick): * is slow as molasses * runs at a snail's pace Not even worth using. Gnome Boxes on Fedora 33 ran far better and faster than Virt Manager does on Debian.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Virt-Manager
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Virt-Manager
- From: gaf.linux at gmail.com (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] Virt-Manager
- References:
- [Discuss] Virt-Manager
- From: epp at sillydog.org (Edward)
- [Discuss] Virt-Manager
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Virt-Manager
- From: epp at sillydog.org (Edward)
- [Discuss] Virt-Manager
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Virt-Manager
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Virt-Manager
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Virt-Manager
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Virt-Manager
- Index(es):
