BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Virt-Manager

Subject: [Discuss] Virt-Manager
From: epp at sillydog.org (Edward)
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:33:10 -0400
In-reply-to: <0C871447-9574-4F97-9104-E739FD0562BC@sillydog.org>
References: <99870ed0-deb6-e9df-dfac-de671104f7f2@sillydog.org> <20211019002040.5quarkwtehz3encq@randomstring.org> <0C871447-9574-4F97-9104-E739FD0562BC@sillydog.org>

On 10/18/21 9:20 PM, Edward wrote:
> I missed a setting, found it afterwards, it defaults to Virtual Network (NAT) and the box to start it automatically was initially not checked.
>
> It's working now.
>

And it (take your pick):

  * is slow as molasses
  * runs at a snail's pace

Not even worth using. Gnome Boxes on Fedora 33 ran far better and faster 
than Virt Manager does on Debian.

Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Virt-Manager
  - From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Virt-Manager
  - From: gaf.linux at gmail.com (Jerry Feldman)

References:
- [Discuss] Virt-Manager
  - From: epp at sillydog.org (Edward)
- [Discuss] Virt-Manager
  - From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Virt-Manager
  - From: epp at sillydog.org (Edward)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] Virt-Manager
Next by Date: [Discuss] Virt-Manager
Previous by thread: [Discuss] Virt-Manager
Next by thread: [Discuss] Virt-Manager
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread