BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] VirutalBox VMs on NVME?
- Subject: [Discuss] VirutalBox VMs on NVME?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:33:59 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20211025213712.00007893.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
- References: <f9ae2ef30907aed5c426c28da3e73606.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <5EF0EEAE-5B89-42B2-AEFF-DC006AF249ED@icloud.com> <84d08fe908c8a3dacd57204d5b2bcf34.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <20211025213712.00007893.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
Oh, I understand, but it is a limitation that makes no sense to me. From a coding perspective, a file and a device are virtually identical. There are quite a few advantages to using files over devices. > On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 20:05:29 -0400 > markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: > >> Yup, that was my problem. It won't use a raw file. It will only work >> on partitions or hard disks. Which, IMHO, is just stupid. > > The entire point of raw device access is to bypass the host filesystem > layer. A file on a host filesystem being treated as a raw device must > be accessed through the host filesystem thus it's not raw I/O any more. > > -- > \m/ (--) \m/ > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at lists.blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
- References:
- [Discuss] VirutalBox VMs on NVME?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] VirutalBox VMs on NVME?
- From: eric.chadbourne at icloud.com (Eric Chadbourne)
- [Discuss] VirutalBox VMs on NVME?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] VirutalBox VMs on NVME?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] VirutalBox VMs on NVME?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Apple email is yucky
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Virt-Manager
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] VirutalBox VMs on NVME?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] VirutalBox VMs on NVME?
- Index(es):