BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] More ZFS Questions
- Subject: [Discuss] More ZFS Questions
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 20:53:30 -0700
- In-reply-to: <d8eb5ee7-d086-f5ce-6687-c312455e6c60@borg.org>
- References: <75d286cc-8cd5-d169-8cbc-cd2b012fea4d@borg.org> <20220820194456.0000448f.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <d8eb5ee7-d086-f5ce-6687-c312455e6c60@borg.org>
On 8/20/22 23:33, Kent Borg wrote: > On 8/20/22 19:44, Rich Pieri wrote: >> Kind of. ZFS in principle knows about disk geometries and how to >> optimize reads and writes so in principle you should let ZFS manage >> whole physical devices. > > I'll try that next. Similar problems. Looking in /var/logs/syslog I see lines like this: > Aug 20 20:48:20 la kernel: [15905.733427] blk_update_request: I/O > error, dev sdb, sector 23473411 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x4700 phys_seg > 71 prio class 0 > Aug 20 20:48:20 la kernel: [15905.746021] zio pool=mail-mirror > vdev=/dev/sdb1 error=5 type=2 offset=12017337856 size=1012224 > flags=40080c80 More problems on one drive than the other, but same errors on both. -kb
- References:
- [Discuss] More ZFS Questions
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] More ZFS Questions
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] More ZFS Questions
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] More ZFS Questions
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] More ZFS Questions
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Boston Linux and Unix Annual Summer BBQ XXVII Saturday August 20, 2022 at 11:00AM (finally good weather)
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] More ZFS Questions
- Next by thread: [Discuss] More ZFS Questions
- Index(es):