BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- Subject: [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- From: benjamin.p.kallus.gr at dartmouth.edu (Ben Kallus)
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:55:31 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAEvgogG2QX-aKgJswesR0PMZasmbBh+=vi8t6N=ETD=R80GE9A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <a98fa24ba5d4e1d55f240eb4eb25f453.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <CAEvgogG2QX-aKgJswesR0PMZasmbBh+=vi8t6N=ETD=R80GE9A@mail.gmail.com>
GitHub, who started and currently maintain Atom, have announced that they're sunsetting it[^1]. This is probably due to Microsoft's acquisition of GitHub and the runaway success of VSCode. Someone could maintain a fork, but I don't think the future looks too bright for Atom. Also, in my experience, Atom's performance is pretty weak (Electron). Personally, when I want something a little more graphical than neovim, I turn to Sublime Text. It's not free software, so I'm hesitant to recommend it, but it's usually good enough to get the job done. [^1]: https://github.blog/2022-06-08-sunsetting-atom/ On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 11:48 AM Jerry Feldman <gaf.linux at gmail.com> wrote: > I generally prefer to use ATOM https://atom.io/ > It is highly customizable and had add ons for most languages. Essentially > until I worked for red Hat, I was an emacs user. > > -- > Jerry Feldman <gaf.linux at gmail.com> > Boston Linux and Unix http://www.blu.org > PGP key id: 6F6BB6E7 > PGP Key fingerprint: 0EDC 2FF5 53A6 8EED 84D1 3050 5715 B88D 6F6 > B B6E7 > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022, 11:25 AM <markw at mohawksoft.com> wrote: > > > I've been using vi (vim) and GNU make for decades. Through the years, > I've > > tried to use an IDE, but they are all so bad for this type of project. > > Every IDE I've used has had a very proprietary view of how it should do > > projects. There was one on Windows years ago called CodeWright which was > > pretty good. > > > > Before all that I used brief. > > > > Are there any IDEs that are easy to use and just a simple "drop in" to > the > > work flow? > > > > I'd like an IDE that can run make, parse the compiler output, find the > > errors, and open the source file at the location of the error? > > > > I looked at KDevelop, and in 5.2 it doesn't even seem to allow you to > edit > > the project build tools any more. > > > > Any suggestions, and no, Eclipse is not an option. > > > > Lastly, I know I can do a lot of this with vim, ctags, etc. but I would > > like to use some more modern tools and maybe make life a little easier. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss mailing list > > Discuss at lists.blu.org > > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at lists.blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- References:
- [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- From: gaf.linux at gmail.com (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- Next by Date: [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- Next by thread: [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- Index(es):